شركاء المحافظ

ما الذي يجب أن تتكلمه المحفظة لتتوافق.

البروتوكولات، والصيغة، وحفظ المفاتيح الذي نتوقعه. وما لن تخبرك به أي صفحة أخرى في هذا القطاع: لم يُكمل شيء قط هذا المسار مقابل هذه الخلية.

اقرأ هذا قبل أن تقدّر أي جهد. لم تُكمل أي محفظة قط إصدارًا ولا عرضًا مقابل هذه الخلية. لا محفظتنا ولا محفظة أحد. البيانات التي تحتاجها المحفظة منشورة وصحيحة؛ أما المسار فلم يسلكه حاملٌ حقيقي من طرفه إلى طرفه قط، لأنه لا تُقدَّم هنا أي محفظة. وإن تكاملت معنا، فستكون أول من يكتشف ما الذي ينكسر، ونفضّل أن تعرف ذلك من البداية.
نقاط النهايةالمطابقة، بثغراتها

تقدّمها الخلية نفسها التي أنتجت هذه الصفحة. افتحها جميعًا إن شئت.

LIVE/.well-known/openid-credential-issuerLIVE/.well-known/oauth-authorization-serverLIVE/manifestLIVE/t/root/status/1LIVE/.well-known/did.json
هذه الصفحة مترجمة جزئيًا. التنقل والعنوان والملخّص وكل التنبيهات أعلاه مترجمة. أما الأقسام المطوّلة أدناه فما زالت بالإنجليزية، ولا تُترجم آليًا في الخلفية: أنت تقرأ النص الأصلي لا تخمينًا له. قراءة الصفحة كاملة بالإنجليزية.

The discovery surface, live now

Everything a wallet reads before it accepts anything is published and answering:

Run it yourself
$ curl https://id.dev.orbis.id/.well-known/openid-credential-issuer
{"credential_issuer":"https://id.dev.orbis.id",
 "credential_endpoint":"https://id.dev.orbis.id/credential",
 "authorization_servers":["https://id.dev.orbis.id"],
 "credential_configurations_supported":{
   "verified-business-member":{"format":"dc+sd-jwt",
     "vct":"verified-business-member"}}}
Recorded response — open /.well-known/openid-credential-issuer for today's

Plus /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server for the pre-authorized-code grant, /manifest for the claim shapes, and /t/root/status/1 for the signed status list.

Two discovery paths are missing, and one of them will bite you. /.well-known/jwt-vc-issuer answers 404, so a wallet following SD-JWT VC discovery rather than the OpenID4VCI path finds nothing. And /.well-known/did-configuration.json answers 404, so the binding between this domain and its DID rests on DNS alone. Both are NOT YET rows on the register.

What we expect of you, and what you can expect of us

01

Keys born on the device

The holder key is generated inside the device's secure element and never leaves it. We do not want a copy and we have no way to accept one.

02

SD-JWT VC today

dc+sd-jwt, ES256. W3C VCDM 2.0 and ISO mdoc are PLANNED, in that order, and the reasons are on the issuer page.

03

Status lists you can cache

Signed, key-identified by RFC 7638 thumbprint, with a TTL, so you can check revocation without asking us at the moment of the check.

04

No callback to us

Everything a wallet or verifier needs is public and cacheable. There is no seam where we would learn what you presented, to whom, or when.

Aligned with HAIP 1.0

Every component the High Assurance Interoperability Profile calls for is implemented on this cell — OpenID4VCI for issuance, OpenID4VP for presentation, SD-JWT VC as the credential format, and cryptographic key binding to the holder's device. HAIP exists so two implementations interoperate without negotiating anything first, and a wallet that speaks it will find this cell speaking it back. Conformance suite: not yet run — the word is awarded by the OpenID Foundation's suite, so the register carries that row as NOT YET.

The full register, one row per standard, with the state of each: /standards.

Ask this site

This is a search, not a language model. There is no AI on this cell: nothing here is generated, your question never leaves your browser, and no request is made when you ask. It searches this site’s own 27 pages and a glossary of 11 terms. You can open and read both below: what this search can see is exactly what you can see. When nothing answers, it says so rather than writing something that sounds like an answer.

Try:

Everything this search can see — all 27 pages, and what each one claims
  • ORBIS.IDYour identity belongs to you. Right now, it belongs to everyone else.Every time you sign up for something, you hand over a copy of yourself — a photo of your passport, a scan of your face, your date of birth. Those copies pile upSections: The grievance, the Article, and the proof · The problem, in one sentence you already know · Five promises — and what each one actually means · Three people, one seal, no copies · The screen where you decide · What we can see, and what we cannot
  • Declaration of Digital IndependenceUniversal Declaration of Digital Independence and Human Digital RightsThe founding document of this estate, written by Jonatan Schmidt and published here unedited. Next to each Article is what the running system actually does abouSections: Universal Grievances Against Digital Oppression · Universal Principles of Digital Sovereignty · A Universal Call to Unified Action · In Witness Whereof · The honest case against this whole idea
  • The Trust FabricTrust, woven in.The trust fabric for the real economy — it turns everyday life into proof you own . An issuer signs a statement, a holder keeps it and decides who sees it, and Sections: Split trust into three roles — never merge them. · A bill becomes proof. Proof becomes credit. · Honesty is the architecture. · The fabric cannot be retrofitted. · Three converging markets — one regulatory clock. · The lines the product already says for itself.
  • Demo consoleThe only demo here is the real thing.There is no recorded walkthrough on this page, no simulated data and no screenshot of a product. There is a running trust plane and the commands that talk to itSections: 01 · The trust anchor · 02 · What this issuer issues · 03 · Is it healthy right now · 04 · Revocation, signed · 05 · Prove it against the published conformance vectors · Two lists, same page, same weight
  • DocumentationGenerated from the route table, so it cannot drift.The wire contract is derived from the live routing table on every request. The document and the server cannot disagree, because one is made out of the other.Sections: Start here · The full contract
  • DevelopersEverything below is a live response.Not documentation of an intended one. Five commands, no account, no API key, no sales call. Run them before you decide whether to keep reading.Sections: 01 · The trust anchor · 02 · Issuer metadata · 03 · The credential shape · 04 · Conformance vectors — check your implementation, not ours · 05 · Revocation, signed · Readiness that reports the hardware
  • CapabilitiesEvery claim, its real state, and the proof.25 entries: 14 live · 1 partial · 1 planned · 9 not yet. Each one was checked against the cell serving this page. Almost nobody in this industry publishes the rSections: What the four words mean · Identity · Issuance · Operations · Verification · Standards
  • StandardsOne row per standard. Including the ones we fail.5 live · 4 partial · 0 planned · 3 not yet. Every row states what the standard demands , what this cell actually does, and the artefact that settles it. Two rowSections: What the four words mean · Credential formats, as their own register · Why every row carries a state
  • RegulationsThe posture, in the same discipline.Conformant where it is true, planned where it is not yet, and never silent about the difference. Data minimisation here is a property of the credential format, Sections: Data minimisation, enforced by cryptography · What the four words mean · Compliance and security capabilities · Security · Compliance · Certification status, stated once and plainly
  • For peopleThe answer is smaller than the question.You photographed your passport again this month. Someone needed to know one thing about you. They now hold your name, your face, your address and your date of bSections: Prove the fact. Keep everything else. · What changes for you · What is real today, and what is not · If you are here for someone else
  • For businessYour own issuer. Your own domain.You mint your own credential types under your own domain. Your members hold them. Your counterparties check them offline, against a public key, with nothing to Sections: You are not early. The deadlines already exist. · The live example is not a mock · What a buyer actually asks · Two lists, same page, same weight · Getting started
  • For citiesA city is a tenant, with its own key.Resident credentials a city issues under its own did:web , checked by services across the city with no shared resident database in the middle — because the checSections: Why the architecture is not city-specific · What a city actually gets from this · Two lists, same page, same weight
  • For governmentTwo questions, both answered with endpoints.What does it conform to, and what is provable without taking our word for it. Everything below links the artefact that settles it — a document you fetch, a fileSections: The property that comes before everything else · Conformance, one row per standard · Accountability · Two lists, same page, same weight
  • PartnersFour roles, and what each one runs.Issuer partners mint their own types under their own tenant. Relying parties verify against the trust anchor. Wallet partners hold on a person's behalf. Data paSections: A page each, with its own evidence · How intake works, and what it costs you · Two lists, same page, same weight
  • Apply as a partnerApply, and here is exactly what happens next.The intake is a public, rate-limited endpoint you can call right now. What happens after it is a person, not a pipeline, and this page says which steps are whicSections: Step 1 · Call the intake · Do it here · What each step actually is · What we do with what you send
  • Application statusWhere your application is, without asking us.A public endpoint answers with the state of an application you hold the id for. No account, no sign-in, no email thread.Sections: Ask it directly · Check it here · What the states mean
  • Issuer partnersYour own key, your own domain, your own exit.An issuer partner runs a tenant with its own did:web , its own signing key, its own status list and its own credential types. The credentials you mint are verifSections: What you actually get, and you can look at all of it now · The formats, as a register · The exit, stated before you sign anything · Two lists, same page, same weight
  • Relying-party partnersVerification takes no key. Count the routes.There is nothing to buy and nothing to sign up for on the verifying side. The verification plane takes no authentication at all, and that is a structural properSections: Count it yourself · What you integrate: three fetches · Test your verifier against ours, offline · What is not proved yet, on the record
  • Wallet partnersWhat a wallet has to speak to interoperate.The protocols, the format, and the key custody we expect. And the thing no other page in this industry will tell you: nothing has ever completed this flow againSections: The discovery surface, live now · What we expect of you, and what you can expect of us · Aligned with HAIP 1.0
  • Data partnersA signed contract, an audit chain, and a short list.A data partner exchanges verified attributes under a signed agreement, with every exchange recorded in a tamper-evident chain. It is also the least built of theSections: What is real underneath · Compliance · What a data partner would get and give · If you want to be first
  • Verify with ORBISThe plane designed to survive everything else being down.Verification needs no signing key, no issuer identity and no vault — a cell can be configured for verification alone. It also needs no permission: 107 of this cSections: Three fetches, no account · The honest line between implemented and witnessed · Two lists, same page, same weight
  • The clock — the deadlines, counted liveEvery date on this page was set by a parliament, not by us.This is not a roadmap. It is a list of legal instruments with dates attached, and the first one has already gone. Nothing below is written down and left to rot:Sections: The instruments, in the order they bite · Switzerland, and what it actually tells you · What “certified” currently means in this field · To a government reading this · To the people building the same thing · To the person these deadlines are actually about
  • How ORBIS compares — and where it loses6 axes. 2 no established vendor holds. 3 we do not hold ourselves.Dozens of vendors sell pieces of this. The founding brief compared fourteen of them across six capabilities and concluded that no competitor held more than threSections: The matrix · Every axis, and how to check it · The discovery probe · What can be proved right now · What we withdrew · The honest gaps
  • Your accountAn account with no password to steal.Not a row in our database with your email on it. An ORBIS.ID account is a key , and the half that matters is designed to be born on your own device and never seSections: What an account actually is · How you get one · What the account can do · How to leave with everything · If you are not here as a person
  • For your organizationYour own issuer identity — and your own way out.An organization on ORBIS is not an account on our platform. It is a tenant with its own web identity, its own signing key, its own revocation list and its own cSections: What your organization becomes · What onboarding actually involves · What it does not require · Three pages, one for each question · The other two doors
  • The operator back officeThe operator console, and the door that will not open yet.Issuance, revocation, the trust registry, the approvals plane, the audit chain and the compliance desk — 195 operator-authenticated operations , the largest surSections: What the back office does · The door, and why it is shut · How an operator signs in · Count it yourself · The other two doors
  • Network operations centreEvery panel on this page is a reading your own browser just took.The trust chain resolved live, the revocation field decoded from the signed list, the audit hash chain recomputed link by link, and this cell’s latency measuredSections: The chain that draws itself as it proves itself. · Tamper-evident, and you are welcome to try. · The finding this page would rather report than hide. · What an operator commands, counted from the wire. · Stated here rather than found later.
The words, in plain language — 11 terms, each naming the specification it glosses
Verifiable credential
Also searched as: verifiable credential, vc, credential, digital credential, what is a credential, certificate
A set of claims about someone, signed by whoever issued them. The signature is what makes it verifiable: whoever receives it can prove it has not been altered and can name the key that signed it, without calling the issuer to ask. It is not a login and not a row in somebody’s database — it is a document the subject holds and presents.
Gloss of W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model 2.0. The concrete format on this cell is SD-JWT VC (IETF). This site’s own claim: /capabilities · served by this cell: /manifest
Issuer, holder, verifier
Also searched as: issuer, holder, verifier, roles, who is the issuer, difference between issuer and verifier, three roles, relying party
Three roles, separated on purpose. The ISSUER signs a claim about you. The HOLDER — you — keeps it and decides who sees it. The VERIFIER checks the signature and the status. Because the verifier does not have to call the issuer to do that check, the issuer does not learn where you used the credential. That separation is the entire point of the model; collapse it and you have rebuilt a login provider.
Gloss of W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model 2.0, which defines these three roles. This site’s own claim: /trust-fabric
The trust chain
Also searched as: trust chain, how do i know, real, genuine, authentic, fake, forged, tampered, how is it verified, verification, verify, verified, signature, signed, trust anchor, check, checked, proof, prove
Checking a credential is four steps, in order, and every one of them can be done by the party receiving it. Read the token and the key it names. Resolve the issuer’s key document. Recompute that key’s thumbprint and compare it to the name in the token. Verify the signature with the algorithm the token itself declares. Nothing in that sequence requires trusting the issuer’s word about the issuer.
Gloss of RFC 7638 (JWK thumbprint), RFC 7515 (JWS), W3C DID Core for resolving the key. This site’s own claim: /trust-fabric · served by this cell: /.well-known/did.json · /conformance/vectors
Selective disclosure
Also searched as: selective disclosure, sd-jwt, sd jwt, withhold, hide claims, privacy, share less, minimum disclosure, only show my age, zero knowledge
Handing over some claims and withholding others without invalidating the issuer’s signature. Each claim is committed to in the signed payload as a salted hash rather than as the value itself; you send only the disclosures you choose, and the receiver recomputes the digests of what you actually sent. Withholding a claim is therefore not an act of trust or of policy — the arithmetic simply does not contain it.
Gloss of IETF SD-JWT and SD-JWT VC. This site’s own claim: /regulations
Revocation and status
Also searched as: revocation, revoked, status list, expired, cancel a credential, withdraw, still valid, status
A credential can be withdrawn after it is issued, so a verifier needs a way to ask whether this one still stands. A status list answers that as one bit per credential in a single compressed, signed document: the verifier fetches the whole list and reads its own bit, so the issuer never learns which credential was being asked about. The privacy property comes from the shape of the answer, not from a promise.
Gloss of IETF Token Status List. This site’s own claim: /trust-fabric · served by this cell: /t/root/status/1
DID — decentralized identifier
Also searched as: did, decentralized identifier, did:web, did web, identifier, who signed it, public key
An identifier that resolves to a document containing public keys. The method decides how that resolution happens. did:web makes the identifier a domain name and serves the document at a well-known path, so resolving it is an ordinary HTTPS fetch anyone can perform and nobody needs a ledger, a token or a permissioned network to complete.
Gloss of W3C DID Core 1.0; method did:web. This site’s own claim: /standards · served by this cell: /.well-known/did.json · /t/root/did.json
How a credential reaches a wallet
Also searched as: oid4vci, issuance, issue, get a credential, openid4vci, how do i receive, onboarding a credential
The protocol a wallet uses to collect a credential from an issuer: the wallet discovers what the issuer offers from a well-known metadata document, obtains authorization, and requests the credential over an ordinary OAuth-shaped exchange. Being ordinary is the feature — it means an issuer does not need a bespoke wallet and a wallet does not need a bespoke issuer.
Gloss of OpenID for Verifiable Credential Issuance (OpenID4VCI). This site’s own claim: /standards · served by this cell: /.well-known/openid-credential-issuer · /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server
How a credential is presented
Also searched as: oid4vp, presentation, present, show a credential, openid4vp, dcql, prove something, log in with a credential
The protocol a verifier uses to ask for credentials and a wallet uses to answer. The verifier states what it needs as a query rather than naming a provider, and the wallet responds with a presentation bound to that specific request — so a captured answer cannot be replayed at a different verifier.
Gloss of OpenID for Verifiable Presentations (OpenID4VP), with DCQL for the query. This site’s own claim: /standards
Wallet
Also searched as: wallet, where is it stored, app, phone, my credentials, hold
The software the holder keeps credentials in, and the place the holder’s keys are created and stay. The property that matters is not the interface: it is that the private key is generated on the device and never leaves it, because a key held by the provider makes the provider the holder no matter what the screen says.
Gloss of No single specification; the relevant ones are OpenID4VCI/VP for the protocols and the platform key stores for custody. This site’s own claim: /for-people
What this site is
Also searched as: orbis, what is orbis, what does this do, what is this, the platform, product, what do you do, help
This surface will not summarise the product for you, because a summary is exactly the kind of claim this site refuses to make without a receipt. What it will do is hand you the register: the capability page states what is live, what is partial and what is not built, each one linked to the endpoint that proves it.
Gloss of Not a specification — a register. This site’s own claim: /capabilities · served by this cell: /openapi.json · /build
The standards
Also searched as: standards, specifications, specs, interoperable, eidas, regulation, compliance, conformance
Verifiable credentials are not one standard but a stack: a data model, a serialization, a protocol to issue, a protocol to present, a way to identify keys and a way to publish status. Interoperability claims are only meaningful per layer, which is why a page that claims the whole stack at once is telling you nothing.
Gloss of W3C VC 2.0, IETF SD-JWT VC, OpenID4VCI/VP, W3C DID Core, IETF Token Status List. This site’s own claim: /standards · served by this cell: /conformance/vectors